America's Tariff Tactics: The Modern Barbarian's Playbook
Have strong opinions about these messages or any other parts of the news? We invite you to share your thoughts by sending us an Email to the Editor. letters@scmp.com or filling in this Google form Submissions should be limited to 400 words or less, and must contain your complete name and address, along with a telephone number for verification purposes.
Regarding your latest documents on the U.S. imposing tariffs as steep as 104 per cent Regarding Chinese products as of April 9, I want to reaffirm the firm stance of the Chinese government.
Despite significant objections from the global community, the United States has levied across-the-board tariff increases on every trade partner under questionable justifications. This represents a clear instance of unilateral action, protective measures, and economic coercion, significantly encroaching upon the rightful benefits of various nations. It also substantially erodes the established framework of multinational trade regulations and deeply disturbs the worldwide economic stability.
Are you looking for insights into the most significant issues and developments globally? Find your answers here. SCMP Knowledge Our latest platform features handpicked content including explainers, FAQs, analyses, and infographics, all provided by our esteemed team of experts.
The United States’ aggressive implementation of tariffs as steep as 104 percent on Chinese products amounts to outright coercion and extortion, an approach that China strongly opposes. These measures taken by the U.S. do not help achieve their aim of making America great again; rather, they portray America as a savage force in the modern era.
Based on your report, the United States claims China really wants to strike a deal urgently, yet they seem unsure about initiating it. We are currently awaiting their phone call.
The truth is that it’s actually the U.S. side that doesn’t comprehend how to initiate things properly. They also fail to grasp the nuances of engaging with China or other nations. Rather than learning these skills, they are preoccupied with what they consider the “art” of coercing and extorting the global community.
We must solemnly tell the US: a tariff-wielding barbarian who attempts to force countries to call and beg for mercy can never expect that call from China. In a phone call with then US president-elect Donald Trump back in January, President Xi Jinping clearly stated that China-US economic ties are mutually beneficial and win-win, and neither confrontation nor conflict should be an option for the two countries; the two sides should follow the principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation, and work more closely together.
Unfortunately, the United States has ignored China's well-intentioned counsel. Should the U.S. genuinely wish to initiate discussions with China regarding tariffs, it must promptly rectify its incorrect actions and embrace an appropriate stance marked by parity, esteem, and reciprocal advantage. Conversely, if the U.S. persists down this erroneous path, China will undoubtedly stand firm until the bitter end!
Given that the high US tariffs also affect Hong Kong, I want to emphasize that the situation here won’t lead to disaster due to Hong Kong’s distinctive position of having support from mainland China as well as global connections.
We are confident that with the strong backing of both the central government and fellow citizens from across the country, Hong Kong has the ability to weather this challenge. Once through these turbulent times, the Oriental Pearl, unafraid of wind or rain, will glow more brilliantly than ever before.
Huang Jingrui, spokesperson for the Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong
To counteract the impact of Trump's tariffs, consider implementing global taxation measures.
The retaliatory tariffs imposed by the United States affect over 180 nations and regions worldwide, with Asia-Pacific exporters suffering significantly. When examining this effect, I feel that the underlying political factors driving these tariffs warrant deeper consideration.
Essentially, the tariffs serve both short-term political advantages and economic goals. They have the potential to compel specific economies to lower or eliminate their trade barriers with the United States. If governments yield under U.S. threats from the Trump administration, these concessions can be portrayed clearly as proof that the U.S. was mistreated. This strategy builds up internal political support but does so at an economic expense.
This implies that proactively negotiating tariffs might not be the best approach for governments. For Trump, reciprocal tariffs aren’t fixed rules but rather an initial stance; they serve as tools for negotiations.
Governments are under pressure, but tariff coercion is unlikely to be sustained over the long term. What is happening now - retaliation from major economies, a sharp plunge in stock markets, price increases and nationwide protests - indicates that the tariff shock must be soothed away before it destroys the US economy and saps the political support gained.
At some stage, the economic necessity would compel the Trump administration to terminate the reciprocal tariffs. Consequently, parties that rush into talks might agree to terms more generously than those choosing to bide their time before negotiating.
How should we address reciprocal tariffs? Enhancing international collaboration on taxation of digital services and establishing a global minimum tax for large corporations deserves more attention. Most OECD member nations have agreed on this approach, but the United States hasn’t joined them yet. Taking joint measures against digital service providers and multinational companies’ earnings would substantially increase expenses for American businesses and customers. This shift might create enough domestic pressure to provide additional negotiating power when discussing tariffs internationally.
Kung-Chen Chen, a PhD candidate in political science at the University of Maryland
What verdict will history render on Trump?
Even the most loyal advocates of the present U.S. leadership would be hard-pressed to ignore that America thrived more during previous presidencies: such as resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis, concluding the Cold War, and facilitating peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine — the roster of both national and global achievements extends further.
Lately, the situation has significantly deteriorated. Following the declaration of an aggressive US tariffs policy , global stock markets plunged and remain volatile President Donald Trump defends the tariffs by arguing that the United States has suffered unfair harm due to trade imbalances with nations globally, and he believes that this issue can only be rectified through the implementation of such taxes.
Someone with even a fundamental knowledge of economics understands that tariffs disrupt free trade – which is typically considered ideal from an economic perspective – and the nation implementing these tariffs will face consequences, regardless of whether its trading partners respond with reciprocal measures.
From the way Trump conducted himself When he met with the Ukrainian President and implemented tariffs on trade partners, one point stands out: his primary concern appears to be his own satisfaction, regardless of the impact these policies may have on others. average American .
Disregard entirely the extensive history of the US claiming moral superiority. Trump aims to portray himself as an intimidating figure whom others fear to challenge. Additionally, he has ambitions to serve a third term as President of the United States.
If the US during earlier administrations acted like a witch-hunter—attempting to uncover head of finance at Huawei extradited to the US, attacking TikTok For allegedly presenting dangers to national security, among other things, the present US administration has taken on the role of the persecutor, brazenly doing so while pinning the blame for its internal economic issues on the global community.
Trump faces no real threat; with ample financial resources, an economic slump would barely affect his lifestyle, regardless of securing another term. Those most adversely affected will likely be individuals experiencing the brunt of increasing costs, particularly those who were swayed by Trump’s aggressive persona and supported him as a result.
Only time will reveal how this U.S. president, who pardoned Criminals found guilty of participating in the riots at Capitol Hill solely because they backed him will be recorded in history textbooks. However, I strongly suspect that the consequences for Trump won’t be particularly favorable.
Andy Jou, Quarry Bay
The world's police officer has endured the cost for far too long.
President Donald Trump’s aggressive move with tariffs has sparked expected criticism from both economic experts and international figures, yet this anger overlooks the main issue. This series of tariffs does not signify withdrawal; rather, it aims for global protection. For an extended period, the United States, as the leading economy and key stabilizer globally, bore the burden of maintaining worldwide stability and wealth creation alone, allowing others to benefit without contributing fairly. Trump’s revised approach seeks nothing more than ensuring every nation contributes equitably towards these shared goals.
In past administrations, the United States accepted persistent trade deficits, offshoring of industries, and increasing national debt—even as it maintained its role as the cornerstone of worldwide financial security and technological advancement. However, under Trump’s leadership, this approach has been reversed. He is tackling the deep-seated issues that had rendered the U.S. economically fragile for years.
As prosperity returns with the recalibrated tariffs and his practical approaches to energy and taxation, these measures will help counterbalance any potential increases in prices due to the new tariffs. The United States can anticipate a stable debt-to-GDP ratio, reduced interest rates, and achieving a balanced budget for the first time in twenty years.
Trump's multi-faceted strategy — reducing governmental wastage, creating additional income via tariffs and deregulation, along with implementing programs such as the "gold card" visa programme - is functioning. These aren’t quick fixes; they are enduring adjustments to reinstate worldwide equilibrium.
Even amidst the clamor, tariffs make practical sense. The United States continues to be the largest consumer marketplace globally. Countries that contemplate responding with reciprocal tariffs might end up hurting themselves more than they would hurt the U.S.
A robust and secure United States leads to a robust and secure globe. Be it during the post-war period of tranquility or when lives are saved via technological advancements, American efforts have been pivotal for years of steadiness. The tariffs imposed by Trump do not signify withdrawal but rather accountability. Should the U.S. keep losing out due to unjust trading practices, it might crumble—and along with it, the worldwide system would fall apart as well.
Trump's policies aren’t driven by nationalism; they’re rooted in strategic pragmatism. This serves as a wake-up call for friends, allies, and adversaries, highlighting that global stability comes at a cost. America has borne this expense for far too long.
Collins Chong Yew Keat, an international relations specialist from the University of Malaya, focuses on analyzing diplomatic matters.
More Articles from SCMP
China’s commitment to neighboring countries, as exporters halt shipments during transit: SCMP Daily Highlights
How Hong Kong’s Universities Are Molding the Arts’ Future
Could Trump's tariffs push countries of the Global South to reveal their true stances on the US and China?
Warm reception awaits Hong Kong rescue team upon their return from earthquake-stricken Myanmar
The article initially appeared on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), which is the premier source for news coverage of China and Asia.
Copyright © 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.